<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHASE BETWEEN SIGNALS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/</link>
	<description>Notes, tutorials, news and articles on digital signal capture, processing, techniques and applications</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Wow - what a question to ask a signal processor!   There is so much.   But if I had to limit myself to just one thing above all else it would be to look at the signal.  Does it look like you expect it? Is it clipped? Did we actually measure anything?  of many automatic systems "assume" the signal is good.

Generally the most used signal processing is frequency analysis - see for example http://blog.prosig.com/2003/07/29/notes-on-fourier-analysis/ what this class  of analysis does is to express the information in term of frequencies as this is often easier to appreciate and to determine  the origin.  Here you have to distinguish between random data, transient data and periodic data. Each has a different progeny method; they all use Fourier analysis of course but in different  ways.

Also no basic discerning signal processing is complete without considering aliasing.

Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - what a question to ask a signal processor!   There is so much.   But if I had to limit myself to just one thing above all else it would be to look at the signal.  Does it look like you expect it? Is it clipped? Did we actually measure anything?  of many automatic systems &#8220;assume&#8221; the signal is good.</p>
<p>Generally the most used signal processing is frequency analysis - see for example <a href="http://blog.prosig.com/2003/07/29/notes-on-fourier-analysis/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.prosig.com/2003/07/29/notes-on-fourier-analysis/</a> what this class  of analysis does is to express the information in term of frequencies as this is often easier to appreciate and to determine  the origin.  Here you have to distinguish between random data, transient data and periodic data. Each has a different progeny method; they all use Fourier analysis of course but in different  ways.</p>
<p>Also no basic discerning signal processing is complete without considering aliasing.</p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikas</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>vikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>hi,i'm preparing for a paper presentation on signal processing.can u give ur suggestion as to what topics and aspects should b included in this.i'm in my 2nd yr. in B.Tech</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,i&#8217;m preparing for a paper presentation on signal processing.can u give ur suggestion as to what topics and aspects should b included in this.i&#8217;m in my 2nd yr. in B.Tech</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>qundeel
You asked "please i need now defrant the phase angle vibration balancing" Did you mean you need to differentiate the phase angle to get rate of change of phase?  You say this is in conjunction with vibration balancing.  Actually we have &lt;a href="http://www.prosig.com/dats/optbalance.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;extensive multiplane balancing software&lt;/a&gt; that is available with DATS. If you could explain your application a little more I may be able to help.

Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qundeel<br />
You asked &#8220;please i need now defrant the phase angle vibration balancing&#8221; Did you mean you need to differentiate the phase angle to get rate of change of phase?  You say this is in conjunction with vibration balancing.  Actually we have <a href="http://www.prosig.com/dats/optbalance.html" rel="nofollow">extensive multiplane balancing software</a> that is available with DATS. If you could explain your application a little more I may be able to help.</p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qundeel</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>qundeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/09/phase-between-signals/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>please i need now defrant the phase angle vibration balancing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please i need now defrant the phase angle vibration balancing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
