<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interpolation Versus Resampling To Increase The Sample Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.prosig.com/2009/06/22/interpolation-versus-resampling-to-increase-the-sample-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/06/22/interpolation-versus-resampling-to-increase-the-sample-rate/</link>
	<description>Telling you what you really need to know about noise &#38; vibration measurement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Petre Petrov</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/06/22/interpolation-versus-resampling-to-increase-the-sample-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Petre Petrov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=194#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Hello!

Interpolation could help if you have enough samples.
&quot;Linear interpolation&quot; from figures above is the simplest but with sin(x) and cos(x) is better.

May be the following papers will help to understand better the topic:

1. &quot;ET 4 CO 198.pmd&quot;,  www.ieindia.org/pdf/88/88ET104.pdf 

2. &quot;9 CP PE 8.pmd&quot;, www.ieindia.org/pdf/89/89CP109.pdf 

3. &quot;Revaluation and replacement of basic terms in the sampling theory&quot;,
www.pueron.org/pueron/nauchnakritika/Th_Re.pdf 

4. http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/jsp/db/board.jsp?id=54913
A note about the definitions of &quot;sine/cosine wave&quot;, &quot;sinusoidal/co-sinusoidal signal” and the &quot;simplest band limited signals&quot;. 

Best regards
Petre Petrov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>Interpolation could help if you have enough samples.<br />
&#8220;Linear interpolation&#8221; from figures above is the simplest but with sin(x) and cos(x) is better.</p>
<p>May be the following papers will help to understand better the topic:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;ET 4 CO 198.pmd&#8221;,  <a href="http://www.ieindia.org/pdf/88/88ET104.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ieindia.org/pdf/88/88ET104.pdf</a> </p>
<p>2. &#8220;9 CP PE 8.pmd&#8221;, <a href="http://www.ieindia.org/pdf/89/89CP109.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ieindia.org/pdf/89/89CP109.pdf</a> </p>
<p>3. &#8220;Revaluation and replacement of basic terms in the sampling theory&#8221;,<br />
<a href="http://www.pueron.org/pueron/nauchnakritika/Th_Re.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.pueron.org/pueron/nauchnakritika/Th_Re.pdf</a> </p>
<p>4. <a href="http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/jsp/db/board.jsp?id=54913" rel="nofollow">http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/jsp/db/board.jsp?id=54913</a><br />
A note about the definitions of &#8220;sine/cosine wave&#8221;, &#8220;sinusoidal/co-sinusoidal signal” and the &#8220;simplest band limited signals&#8221;. </p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Petre Petrov</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suwarnov</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/06/22/interpolation-versus-resampling-to-increase-the-sample-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Suwarnov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=194#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Short explanation but very clear, Thanks. This technique was used in data or signal compression technology, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short explanation but very clear, Thanks. This technique was used in data or signal compression technology, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAMEER</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/06/22/interpolation-versus-resampling-to-increase-the-sample-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>SAMEER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=194#comment-576</guid>
		<description>This is very good and easy to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very good and easy to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
