<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Amplitude And Energy Correction – A Brief Summary</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/</link> <description>Telling you what you need to know about noise &#38; vibration</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: John Mathey</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-15582</link> <dc:creator>John Mathey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 12:27:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-15582</guid> <description>Matthieu,
Calculating the RSS is simply a vector sum of the 3 orthogonal components s, y, &amp; z..  In mathematical terminology it is x^2 + y^2 + z^2.  Typically this is done on the RMS levels or amplitudes of the signals and not the raw time signals as the calculation includes squaring of the signals which will loose the phase relationship of the raw time signals.  The RSS can be calculated using the Auto Power spectra or Power Spectral Density or any other RMS levels calculated (single numbers, order cuts, etc) for the x, y, and z signals giving a single spectrum.The PROSIG software provides a module for performing this calculation on data curves (RMS vs time, RMS vs. frequency, etc....) .  This module is call CALCRESULTANT and can be found in two places in the analysis menu or side panel underCrash Biomechanics                                   Calculate x,y,z ResultantorHuman Biodynamics
Human Body Vibration                        Calculate x,y,z ResultantThis module also allows for individual weighting of the signals if one or more of the 3 directions are of more importance in your calculations.I hope this feedback is helpful.  If you have additional questions, please feel free to contact me.John Mathey
Technical Support
PROSIG-USA
john.mathey@prosig.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthieu,<br
/> Calculating the RSS is simply a vector sum of the 3 orthogonal components s, y, &amp; z..  In mathematical terminology it is x^2 + y^2 + z^2.  Typically this is done on the RMS levels or amplitudes of the signals and not the raw time signals as the calculation includes squaring of the signals which will loose the phase relationship of the raw time signals.  The RSS can be calculated using the Auto Power spectra or Power Spectral Density or any other RMS levels calculated (single numbers, order cuts, etc) for the x, y, and z signals giving a single spectrum.</p><p>The PROSIG software provides a module for performing this calculation on data curves (RMS vs time, RMS vs. frequency, etc&#8230;.) .  This module is call CALCRESULTANT and can be found in two places in the analysis menu or side panel under</p><p>Crash Biomechanics                                   Calculate x,y,z Resultant</p><p> or</p><p>Human Biodynamics<br
/> Human Body Vibration                        Calculate x,y,z Resultant</p><p>This module also allows for individual weighting of the signals if one or more of the 3 directions are of more importance in your calculations.</p><p>I hope this feedback is helpful.  If you have additional questions, please feel free to contact me.</p><p>John Mathey<br
/> Technical Support<br
/> PROSIG-USA<br
/> <a
href="mailto:john.mathey@prosig.com">john.mathey@prosig.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthieu Tessier</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-14657</link> <dc:creator>Matthieu Tessier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-14657</guid> <description>Hello,
As part of a vibration measurement campaign, I&#039;m being asked to provide acceleration levels. vibration spectrum and &quot;complex of loads acting on a component (x,y,z)&quot;.
The last item is not really clear to me.
I&#039;ve previously heard of RSS values to obtain a single spectrum from a tri-axial vibration measurement.
How do I need to process my raw vibration data to obtain a RSS spectrum?
If anyone has an idea, please let me know.
Thanks and regards,
Matthieu</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br
/> As part of a vibration measurement campaign, I&#8217;m being asked to provide acceleration levels. vibration spectrum and &#8220;complex of loads acting on a component (x,y,z)&#8221;.<br
/> The last item is not really clear to me.<br
/> I&#8217;ve previously heard of RSS values to obtain a single spectrum from a tri-axial vibration measurement.<br
/> How do I need to process my raw vibration data to obtain a RSS spectrum?<br
/> If anyone has an idea, please let me know.<br
/> Thanks and regards,<br
/> Matthieu</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Mathey</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link> <dc:creator>John Mathey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:43:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-771</guid> <description>Thank you for your comment to the blog.The answer to your question depends on what information you are looking for from the strain gage.If you need know the static strain, then the strain gage sensor should be zeroed out prior to putting the component under load, then the DC offset value will be the component&#039;s loaded static strain. The dynamic (vibratory) strain will be superimposed on the DC signal level.  You might find the DC level will use up much of the dynamic range of the measuring instrumentation not permitting optimized gain settings for the dynamic signal.If you are only looking for the dynamic strain due to vibration, then you can remove the DC offset value from the strain gage sensor signal.  This will allow the channel gain setting to be increased to optimal levels for the dynamic signal.I hope this response adequately addresses your question.  Please feel free to contact me directly if you have additional questions.John Mathey
PROSIG-USA
john.mathey@prosig.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment to the blog.</p><p>The answer to your question depends on what information you are looking for from the strain gage.</p><p>If you need know the static strain, then the strain gage sensor should be zeroed out prior to putting the component under load, then the DC offset value will be the component&#8217;s loaded static strain. The dynamic (vibratory) strain will be superimposed on the DC signal level.  You might find the DC level will use up much of the dynamic range of the measuring instrumentation not permitting optimized gain settings for the dynamic signal.</p><p>If you are only looking for the dynamic strain due to vibration, then you can remove the DC offset value from the strain gage sensor signal.  This will allow the channel gain setting to be increased to optimal levels for the dynamic signal.</p><p>I hope this response adequately addresses your question.  Please feel free to contact me directly if you have additional questions.</p><p>John Mathey<br
/> PROSIG-USA<br
/> <a
href="mailto:john.mathey@prosig.com">john.mathey@prosig.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eapen</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link> <dc:creator>Eapen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:51:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-758</guid> <description>i have got some readings from a strain gage sensor,now should i remove the DC offset value to get the proper values or shoulldnt i...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have got some readings from a strain gage sensor,now should i remove the DC offset value to get the proper values or shoulldnt i&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gareth Edwards</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link> <dc:creator>Gareth Edwards</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:33:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-727</guid> <description>John,Good explanation for the ideal sinusoidal case. A couple of comments:Equation 2 is incorrect - sqrt(1.5) = 1.2247...VrmsIt would be good to expand on this subject to include how to evaluate sinusoidal Vrms signals that are not located on a discrete spectral frequency. Or include the general version of Equation 6 which is the squared &quot;area under the curve&quot; as opposed to the sum of discrete spectral components</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p><p>Good explanation for the ideal sinusoidal case. A couple of comments:</p><p>Equation 2 is incorrect &#8211; sqrt(1.5) = 1.2247&#8230;Vrms</p><p>It would be good to expand on this subject to include how to evaluate sinusoidal Vrms signals that are not located on a discrete spectral frequency. Or include the general version of Equation 6 which is the squared &#8220;area under the curve&#8221; as opposed to the sum of discrete spectral components</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Mason</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link> <dc:creator>Chris Mason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:08:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-620</guid> <description>Hi EmmaI expect you&#039;ve already had a look around the rest of the blog, but there are a couple of other posts that might help.There is the article &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.prosig.com/2003/07/29/notes-on-fourier-analysis/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Notes On Fourier Analysis&lt;/a&gt; by Dr Mercer. This has some good illustrated examples and also looks at the mathematics behind the Fourier Transform.Also, you may find &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.prosig.com/2009/04/22/10-great-fourier-transform-links/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10 Great Fourier Transform Links&lt;/a&gt; helpful. This collects together several good WWW resources. One of the best links there is a series of lectures by Professor Brad Osgood of Stanford University. There are about 30 hour long lectures, but maybe the first few will help you.Anyway, good luck with your thesis. If you have any specific questions then feel free to post a comment somewhere on the blog and one of our posters may be able to help.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Emma</p><p>I expect you&#8217;ve already had a look around the rest of the blog, but there are a couple of other posts that might help.</p><p>There is the article <a
href="http://blog.prosig.com/2003/07/29/notes-on-fourier-analysis/" rel="nofollow">Notes On Fourier Analysis</a> by Dr Mercer. This has some good illustrated examples and also looks at the mathematics behind the Fourier Transform.</p><p>Also, you may find <a
href="http://blog.prosig.com/2009/04/22/10-great-fourier-transform-links/" rel="nofollow">10 Great Fourier Transform Links</a> helpful. This collects together several good WWW resources. One of the best links there is a series of lectures by Professor Brad Osgood of Stanford University. There are about 30 hour long lectures, but maybe the first few will help you.</p><p>Anyway, good luck with your thesis. If you have any specific questions then feel free to post a comment somewhere on the blog and one of our posters may be able to help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emma Daly</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link> <dc:creator>Emma Daly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:30:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-619</guid> <description>Hi, JohnI am a final year engineering student and I am doing my thesis on damage detection using distributed accelerometer. In this I will be using the Fast fourier transforms and know very little about the topic. Is there any chance you have any information that will help me understand the basic? Any help at all would be greatly appreciated.Emma</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, John</p><p>I am a final year engineering student and I am doing my thesis on damage detection using distributed accelerometer. In this I will be using the Fast fourier transforms and know very little about the topic. Is there any chance you have any information that will help me understand the basic? Any help at all would be greatly appreciated.</p><p>Emma</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yevgeni Tunik</title><link>http://blog.prosig.com/2009/09/01/amplitude-and-energy-correction-a-brief-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link> <dc:creator>Yevgeni Tunik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:36:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=266#comment-618</guid> <description>The text in the pictures is almost unreadable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text in the pictures is almost unreadable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: blog.prosig.com @ 2012-02-07 22:09:44 by W3 Total Cache -->
