<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Prosig Noise &#38; Vibration Measurement Blog &#187; microphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.prosig.com/tag/microphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.prosig.com</link>
	<description>Telling you what you really need to know about noise &#38; vibration measurement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison Between Sound Intensity Probes and Acoustic Cameras</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2010/03/15/comparison-between-sound-intensity-probes-and-acoustic-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2010/03/15/comparison-between-sound-intensity-probes-and-acoustic-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes we are asked about the differences between an acoustic camera and a sound intensity probe and which of the two is better for a particular application. There is no straightforward answer as they are quite different pieces of equipment, used for measuring different things. An acoustic camera is a tool used to locate and analyse [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2010/03/15/comparison-between-sound-intensity-probes-and-acoustic-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the difference between microphone types?</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2010/01/19/what-is-the-difference-between-microphone-types/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2010/01/19/what-is-the-difference-between-microphone-types/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound pressure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I’m often asked what is the difference between free field microphones, diffuse field microphones and pressure microphones.</p>
<p>For a run-of-the-mill ½ inch microphone the short answer is nothing.</p>
<p>However the long answer is a bit more involved.</p>
<p>Basically if the sample rate is 10 kHz or below and an accuracy of ±2dB is acceptable then there is no real [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2010/01/19/what-is-the-difference-between-microphone-types/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sound Steering</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2007/09/12/sound-steering/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2007/09/12/sound-steering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr Colin Mercer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard O'Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steering pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterfalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosig.com/blog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The requirement was to develop a ‘standard’ test for assessing the sound quality of power steering pumps in vehicles. Measurements needed to be objective so that the method would be suitable for evaluating dissimilar vehicles and different types of pump.</p>
<p>Noise is an important consideration when a consumer is selecting a new vehicle. It is therefore imperative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2007/09/12/sound-steering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Made To Measure</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2006/06/06/made-to-measure/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2006/06/06/made-to-measure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accelerometer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAN-bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strain gage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strain gauge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transducer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vibration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2007/11/19/made-to-measure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In this note the different types of transducers that can be used with the Prosig P8000 series data acquisition system are discussed. The article deals with the design and function of the different types of transducer and the applications they are normally associated with.</p>
<p></p>
Accelerometers
<p>An accelerometer is an instrument used to measure acceleration. It is normally attached [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2006/06/06/made-to-measure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exhaust Development Using A Prosig P8000 System</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2006/02/20/exhaust-development-using-a-prosig-p8000-system/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2006/02/20/exhaust-development-using-a-prosig-p8000-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamometer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exhaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muffler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterfall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2006/02/20/exhaust-development-using-a-prosig-p8000-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The following note describes               an application of the Prosig P8000/DATS system in the refinement               of an automotive exhaust muffler design for a major after-market     [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2006/02/20/exhaust-development-using-a-prosig-p8000-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Simple Noise Test</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/26/a-simple-noise-test/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/26/a-simple-noise-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accelerometer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exhaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formula Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muffler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tachometer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterfall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/26/a-simple-noise-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent article we described               how the Prosig P8000 hardware and DATS software had been used to               help Dalmeny Racing diagnose a problem with an exhaust bracket [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2005/08/26/a-simple-noise-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Correlation Example</title>
		<link>http://blog.prosig.com/2001/06/06/correlation-example/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.prosig.com/2001/06/06/correlation-example/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2001 14:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr Colin Mercer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coherence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[correlation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosig.com/blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To illustrate the use of the cross correlation function, a source location example is shown below.  			For this it is assumed there is a noise source at some unknown position between 2 microphones. A 			cross correlation technique and a transfer function like approach were used to determine the location.</p>
<p>
To simulate the noise a broad band [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.prosig.com/2001/06/06/correlation-example/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
